napari’s application model#
Important
This is currently not a part of the public napari interface but we are considering
ways to expose execution of actions registered with app
. This documentation will
be updated accordingly.
Warning
Work in progress! The napari application model is currently being developed. This document is here to give guidance but things may change as we develop. It may link to current pull requests and issues which have more up to date information on specific areas.
App-model#
app-model
is a Python package
that provides a declarative schema for a GUI-based
application. It is an abstraction developed by napari developers, with the
needs of napari in mind, but it is agnostic to napari itself (i.e. it should be
reusable by any Python GUI application).
The NapariApplication
(app
)
is the top level object that stores information about the commands, keybindings
and menus that make up the application.
It is a subclass of app_model.Application
and is a global application
singleton. It can be retrieved with napari._app_model.get_app_model
.
Currently, the primary purpose of the app
is to compose the following
app_model.registries
into a single name-spaced object:
CommandsRegistry
: maintains all of the commands (the actual callable objects) that have been registered with the application. Accessible viaapp.commands
.MenusRegistry
: maintains all of the menus and submenus that have been registered with the application. Accessible viaapp.menus
.KeyBindingsRegistry
: maintains the association between a KeyBinding and a command ID in theCommandsRegistry
. Accessible viaapp.keybindings
.
The app-model
‘Getting started’
page provides a good general introduction to app-model.
This documentation will focus on napari specific aspects.
Action
s#
The app_model.types.Action
class is designed to easily create a high level
‘Action’ object that is the “complete” representation of a command: a pointer
to a callable object and optionally placement in menus, keybindings, and additional
metadata like title, icons, tooltips etc. It subclasses
app_model.types.CommandRule
and takes app_model.types.MenuRule
and
app_model.types.KeyBindingRule
arguments.
The following code demonstrates the definition of a Action
comprised of a “Split RGB” command, which is to be added to a specific section (group)
of the “layerlist context” menu, with a Cmd+Alt+T
keybinding.
Note that while strings could be used for id
, title
, menus.id
and
keybindings.primary
, the usage of enums and constants makes refactoring and
maintenance much easier (and provides autocompletion in an IDE!). However, there is
currently intention to use plain strings for command id
and title
to simplify the
Action
definitions.
from app_model.types import Action, KeyMod, KeyCode
from napari._app_model.constants import CommandId, MenuId, MenuGroup
from napari._app_model.context import LayerListContextKeys as LLCK
# `layers` will be injected later when this action is invoked
def split_rgb_layer(layers: 'LayerList'):
...
action = Action(
id=CommandId.LAYER_SPLIT_RGB,
title=CommandId.LAYER_SPLIT_RGB.title,
callback=split_rgb_layer,
menus = [
{
'id': MenuId.LAYERLIST_CONTEXT,
'group': MenuGroup.LAYERLIST_CONTEXT.SPLIT_MERGE,
'when': LLCK.active_layer_is_rgb,
}
],
keybindings=[{'primary': KeyMod.CtrlCmd | KeyMod.Alt | KeyCode.KeyT }]
)
Action
s can be registered via app_model.Application.register_action()
. This
is essentially a shortcut for registering objects with the following registries;
CommandsRegistry
,
MenusRegistry
and
KeyBindingsRegistry
. Note that a command ID may
currently only be registered once though this MAY change in the future if a need arises.
The code below shows how to register the action
defined above with the napari
singleton app
:
from napari._app_model import get_app_model
get_app_model().register_action(action)
Note
If you’re following along in the console, you may see the following error when executing the above code:
ValueError: Command 'napari:layer:split_rgb' already registered
This is because command id’s may currently only be registered once, and associated with a single callback (and napari’s internal app already used the CommandId.LAYER_SPLIT_RGB
id).
Action
s in napari#
In napari, menu bar actions are defined in
napari/_qt/_qapp_model/qactions
,
with one file per menu.
While not all menu bar actions strictly require Qt, they are defined for the purpose
of living in a menu and are thus considered ‘GUI’ actions.
This also ensures that there is only one file defining both actions and their
submenus.
Note if we move to supporting more GUI backends, we may want to move these out of
_qt/
to a shared gui/
folder, depending on implementation.
The layer context menu actions do not require a GUI (they only require the layerlist
)
and thus live in
napari/_app_model/actions
.
Non-Qt Action
s get registered with app
during
initialization of the napari app
, in NapariApplication
’s
__init__()
. Qt Action
s
get registered in
napari._qt._qapp_model.qactions.init_qactions
, which gets
called during initialization of _QtMainWindow
. Note this is relevant when
considering the differences between app-model and action manager implementation,
see app-model vs action manager implementation differences for more.
Commands#
Commands represent callable objects that “do something” in napari, and usually have a corresponding representation somewhere in the GUI (such as a button, a menu item, or a keybinding).
Important
Inline (lambda) and nested functions should be avoided for command callbacks to prevent memory leakage.
All commands have a string ID (e.g. ‘napari.window.file.open_files_dialog
’).
The string is arbitrary, and the only real requirement is that the same command ID
string cannot be used twice. However, to help readability and usability, we use
the following naming conventions:
use
.
to separate wordsstart with
napari
for builtin commands or the plugin name for plugin commandsthe
napari.window
prefix indicates thenapari
command is part of a GUI menuthe final word should be the name of the function callback
app_model.types.CommandRule
class (of which Action
is a subclass) includes many fields to detail various aspects of commands.
See app_model.types.CommandRule
for details on every field.
Notable CommandRule
fields
are enablement
and toggled
, which both can take an
app_model.expressions.Expr
, an expression that can be evaluated, with
context if required (see Contexts and Expressions in napari for more details).
enablement
determines whether the command is enabled in the UI. It does not prevent
the command from being executed via other means, e.g., via
app_model.registries.CommandsRegistry.execute_command()
. toggled
determines
whether the command appears checked/toggled in GUI representations (e.g., menu or
button). It can also take a app_model.types.ToggleRule
, which allows
you to use a callable (instead of an expression) to determine toggle state.
Commands should not be confused with the public napari API#
While it is conceivable that plugins might need/want to refer to one of these
napari commands by its string id, it is not currently a goal that napari
end-users would execute any of these commands by their ID. There should always
be a “pure python” way to import a napari object and call it. For example,
sample data is added to the File
-> Open Sample
menu but you can also
use napari.Viewer.open_sample()
to open a sample data in headless mode.
Commands mostly serve as a way to reference some functionality that needs to be exposed in the GUI.
Note
Some of these command ID strings MAY be exposed externally in the future. For example, a plugin may wish to refer to a napari command.
Commands in napari#
Commands are usually defined with their Action definition or with its class,
if it is a class method.
See Actions in napari for details on where Action
s are defined in napari.
Keybindings#
App-model has an extensive internal representation of
Key codes,
and combinations of key press events (including chorded key press sequences such
as Cmd+K
followed by Cmd+M
).
They will provide independence from
vispy’s key codes, and have a nice IntEnum
API that allows for declaration of
keybindings in a namespaced way that avoids usage of strings:
>>> from app_model.types import KeyCode, KeyMod
>>> ctrl_m = KeyMod.CtrlCmd | KeyCode.KeyM
>>> ctrl_m
<KeyCombo.CtrlCmd|KeyM: 2078>
A keybinding can be specified using the keybindings
field in
Action
. This takes a app_model.types.KeyBindingRule
,
which will let you provide keybindings for all three operating systems.
Keybindings in napari#
App-model keybindings are currently only being used for menu bar items that
have migrated to using app-model Action
s.
Pull request 6204
migrates layer and viewer actions to app-model as well as implements NAP-7,
which addresses how keybindings are dispatched according to their priority, enablement,
and potential conflicts. It also enables keybindings to be editable by the user
at runtime (see issue 6600
for more on this). Note that it is likely that this pull request will be split into
smaller pull requests for ease of review and better git history.
Dependency injection and result processing#
Dependency injection allows to write functions using parameter type annotations, and then inject dependencies (arguments) into those functions at call time. Very often in a GUI application, you may wish to infer some command arguments from the current state of the application. For example, if you have menu item linked to a “close window” action, you likely want to close the current window. Dependency injection enables this by providing arguments to commands at runtime, based on the type annotations in the command function definition. A ‘provider’, a function that can be called to return an instance of a given type, is used to obtain the dependency to be injected.
Result processing allows you to process the return value of the command function at
execution time, based on command return type annotations.
For example, you may wish to automatically add layer data output from a command
to the viewer. It is performed by processors
, functions that accept an instance of a
given type and do something with it. Note that any value returned by a processor will
be ignored, it is the ‘processor’ function side effects that perform the desired
action (e.g., adding layer data to the viewer).
Dependency injection and result processing are provided by the package
in-n-out (which spun out of an
internal napari module). App-model uses in-n-out to inject dependencies into all
commands in the CommandsRegistry
.
See the in-n-out documentation
for details on how providers and processors work.
In napari, providers and processors can be registered in the app
’s
injection_store
attribute, which is an instance of
in_n_out.Store
.
This Store
is just a collection of providers and processors. Providers
and processors in the Store
will automatically be used when executing
CommandsRegistry
commands.
Note
Injection is implemented in app-model, via the run_injected
property of
_RegisteredCommand
. All commands in the CommandsRegistry
are represented using
the _RegisteredCommand
type.
Below is an example of provider use in napari, which demonstrates implementation details.
A user/plugin provides a function, using the Points
annotation:
# some user provided function declares a need
# for Points by using type annotations.
def process_points(points: 'Points'):
# do something with points
print(points.name)
Tip
If a default value is provided to a function parameter, no dependency injection will
occur. This can be used if you want to bind an object at Action
definition time
instead of command execution time.
Internally, napari registers a provider that returns the first Points layer of the
current viewer, if one present (returning None
if not). It is
registered in the app.injection_store
via app.injection_store.register_provider
. Processors can be registered in the same way.
from napari._app_model import get_app_model
# return annotation indicates what this provider provides
def provide_points() -> Optional['Points']:
import napari.viewer
from napari.layers import Points
viewer = napari.viewer.current_viewer()
if viewer is not None:
return next(
(i for i in viewer.layers if isinstance(i, Points)),
None
)
get_app_model().injection_store.register_provider(provide_points)
This allows both internal and external functions to be injected with these provided objects, and therefore called without parameters in certain cases. This is particularly important in a GUI context, where a user can’t always be providing arguments:
>>> injected_func = get_app_model().injection_store.inject(process_points)
Note: injection doesn’t inherently mean that it’s always safe to call an injected function without parameters. In this case, we have no viewer and no points:
>>> injected_func()
TypeError: After injecting dependencies for NO arguments,
process_points() missing 1 required positional argument: 'points'
Our provider was context dependent. Only when we have an active viewer with a points layer, can it be provided:
>>> viewer = napari.view_points(name='Some Points')
>>> injected_func()
Some Points
The fact that injected_func
may now be called without parameters allows it to
be used easily as a command in a menu, or bound to a keybinding. It is up to
napari to determine what providers it will make available, and what type hints
plugins/users may use to request dependencies.
Annotation and namespaces#
For parameter annotations to be resolved by in-n-out, the object must be in the
“global” or “local” namespace. The “global” namespace consists of the items
in the callback function’s function.__globals__
attribute.
In in-n-out the “local” namespace consists of objects in the typing
and types
modules’ namespace, and objects in the
napari injection_store
’s namespace
attribute.
In the napari app
’s Store
, some basic napari objects are added to the namespace
attribute:
all public types from
napari.components
,napari.layers
andnapari.viewer
This means that when annotating a callback function, you will not need to import any of the above classes for the annotation to be resolved. For other classes you will need to import them at the module level. Importing in any of the following ways will not work:
import within
typing.TYPE_CHECKING
import within an outer function, where the callback function is an inner function
Providers and processors in napari#
Currently there are only GUI related providers and processors.
They are defined in
napari/_qt/_qapp_model/injection
.
They are registered in napari._qt._qapp_model.qactions.init_qactions
,
which gets called during initialization of _QtMainWindow
. This is the same as
registration of Action
s.
In future we intend to have non-GUI providers that will supply layer objects.
They would be registered in the app
Store
during
initialization of the napari app
, in NapariApplication
’s
napari._app_model._app.NapariApplication.__init__
.
Providers and processors allow us to mirror behaviour enabled by
magicgui
type registration for widgets. Providers
allow generalization of magicgui
parameter annotation behaviour to all
actions, while processors do this for return annotation behaviour.
The intended users of providers/processors are end-users, plugins as well as napari
internally, however it is currently only used internally.
For a detailed discussion on this framework see
issue 4532.
app-model
initialization order#
On napari
start up, app-model
initialization occurs in the following order:
Initialize
Viewer
, which callsnapari.plugins._initialize_plugins
, which registers discovered plugins and all their actions (non-Qt first, followed immedidately by Qt actions). This also results in the first call tonapari._app_model.get_app_model
.i. Instantiation of the
app-model
app results in registration of all non-GUI internalnapari
actions (and associated submenus). Note that thenapari._app_model.get_app_model
call creates theapp
only when first called. It simply returns the existing app on all subsequent calls.Window
instantiation, followed by instantiation of_QtMainWindow
, during which we callnapari._qt._qapp_model.qactions.init_qactions
. This registers allnapari
Qt actions (and associated submenus), providers and processors.
app-model
testing#
This section provides a guide to testing app-model aspects of napari. For general information on napari testing see Testing.
Mock app#
The NapariApplication
, app
, is a global application
singleton. This is not ideal because changes made in a previous test will persist and
can cause conflicts for subsequent tests, when running a suite of tests.
Segmentation faults can also occur as a
singleton app
may keep a reference to an object, e.g., a
Window
, that has
since been cleaned up at the end of a previous test.
Thus, we mock the app
in a _mock_app
fixture, and
explicitly use it in make_napari_viewer as well as in all tests that
use the get_app_model
function. This way, a new instance of app
is returned
every time napari._app_model.get_app_model
is used inside a test. This ‘test’ app
is available for use throughout the test’s
duration and will get cleaned up at the end.
Note
Since the _mock_app
fixture is used in make_napari_viewer
, plugins and other
external users that write tests using make_napari_viewer
will also have the benefit
of a new app for each test.
The mock app
registers non-Qt Action
s, providers and processors. This is
because it was thought that these would be required for the majority of tests.
If a plain app
is required, it can be created by making a new
NapariApplication
instance.
Qt items are not registered because we did not think it would be best practice to
have Qt objects registered for every test.
If Qt Action
s, providers or processors are required, they can be registered by using
the make_napari_viewer
fixture, which will run
napari._qt._qapp_model.qactions.init_qactions
,
napari.plugins._initialize_plugins
as well as create a
Viewer
. Alternatively, manually run the required function,
ensuring you run cache_clear
first, to bypass the
functools.lru_cache()
on these functions.
The app
gives you access to its CommandsRegistry
,
MenusRegistry
and
KeyBindingsRegistry
. Some useful methods:
app_model.registries.CommandsRegistry.execute_command()
allows you to manually execute registered commands. Note that commands can always be executed this way regardless of its enablement state.app_model.registries.MenusRegistry.get_menu()
allows you to obtain any registeredapp_model.types.MenuItem
orapp_model.types.SubmenuItem
.
Menus#
The QModelMenu
of menu bar items are saved as
Window
attributes. These are useful as the
QAction
s of the commands in these menus can be found via
the QModelMenu
’s
findAction()
method. QAction
s of submenu
of a QModelMenu
currently cannot be found via
findAction()
. The utility function
napari._qt._qapp_model._tests.utils.get_submenu_action
can be used instead.
Contexts#
A context is essentially a mapping between variable names and their values. For details on contexts and expressions see Contexts and Expressions in napari.
There are currently two
ContextNamespace
classes in
napari; LayerListContextKeys
and
LayerListSelectionContextKeys
. These map
variables to various values obtained using LayerList
and selection LayerList
(e.g., “Number of selected points
layers”). They are defined in
napari/_app_model/context
.
An instance of each class is created and saved as an attribute of
LayerList
. The
update()
methods of each are then connected to events that change the
LayerList
or selected LayerList
.
Variables in these classes can be used in expressions
in the Action
enablement
field and
menus MenuRule
’s when
field (see Menus
for details).
Currently, the app_model.Application
class does not have a
context registry but it may in future (more details can be found
here).
napari therefore needs to manually update the context via
update_from_context()
. For menu bar items,
we connect update_from_context()
to the
aboutToShow
event of each menu bar QModelMenu
instance,
in napari.window.Window._add_menus()
.
Migration from action manager#
Motivation & Future Vision#
While it’s certainly possible that there will be cases where this abstraction in app-model proves to be a bit more annoying than the previous “procedural” approach, there are a number of motivations for adopting this abstraction.
It gives us an abstraction layer on top of Qt that will make it much easier to explore different application backends (such as a web-based app, etc..)
It’s easier to test:
app-model
can take care of making sure that commands, menus, keybindings, and actions are rendered, updated, and triggered correctly, and napari can focus on testing the napari-specific logic.It’s becomes much easier to add & remove contributions from plugins if our internal representation of a command, menu, keybinding is similar to the schema that plugins use. The previous procedural approach made this marriage much more cumbersome.
The Dream: The unification of napari commands and plugin commands into a registry that can execute commands in response to user input provides an excellent base for “recording” a user workflow. If all GUI user interactions go through dependency-injected commands, then it becomes much easier to export a script that reproduces a set of interactions.
app-model vs action manager implementation differences#
App-model and action manager differ in when actions are registered.
In app-model, actions are registered (on
NapariApplication
and
Window
initialization). This is much earlier than with
action manager, where actions are registered when building the menus.
For example, with action manager, a PluginsMenu
class instance is created when
building the menu bar. Plugins menu actions are thus registered at a time when
we know we have access to Qt.
In app-model, plugins menu actions are registered during
napari.plugins._initialize_plugins
, which is run on initialization of
napari.viewer.Viewer
. This is much earlier in napari startup and is before
we know if we have access to Qt. Thus, we register with
napari.plugins._npe2._safe_register_qt_actions
, which first checks if
Qt is available.